An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
May 21st, 2008
When Expert Clinicians Disagree
Periodically, in AIDS Clinical Care, we publish a case in the “Antiretroviral Rounds” section and ask two clinical experts in our field how they would manage such a patient. The most recent case elicited responses that were 180 degrees different.
(This is exactly what we’re after, by the way — why present a case in which everyone would do the same thing?)
The full details of the case are on the AIDS Clinical Care web site, but in brief: A 50-year-old man with longstanding HIV was admitted to the hospital with gallstone pancreatitis, during which time he experienced virologic rebound since he couldn’t take anything by mouth. Athough for years he’d been mostly virologically suppressed — with some values between 50 and 500 cop/mL — on a regimen of TDF/FTC and boosted fosamprenavir, the resistance genotype sent after viral rebound showed extensive triple-class drug resistance. Resuming therapy after his recovery led to a drop in the viral load again to undetectable. Should this patient change treatment?
One of our respondents (Joe Gathe) said — confidently — to stay the course, no change; the other (Rick Elion) said — assuredly — to change to a completely new regimen. Is it possible that both are right? After all, both these guys have extensive clinical experience in HIV care and research; are widely respected in the field; and were able to cite excellent reasons defending their management decisions. These are the kind of doctors you’d send a family member or friend to if he/she had HIV.
So I’ll go out on a limb and say yes, both were right — but for the non-clinician, the fact that there are such different ways to manage one problem can be unsettling. Indeed, our executive editor (a non-MD) said she felt “uncomfortable” with these vastly different approaches to treatment.
Needless to say, the case is drawn from real life, but before I divulge how it was managed, I’d be interested to hear what others would do.
Paul E. Sax, MD
Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.
Follow HIV and ID Observations Posts via Email
- Five Quick Questions from Our Course, “ID in Primary Care”
- Five ID Things to Be Grateful For, 2022 Edition
- #IDTwitter — Still a Wonderful and Entertaining Place to Learn
- Molnupiravir Results in PANORAMIC Study — It’s Not All Bad News
- Learning the Names of HIV Drugs Is Horribly Difficult — Here’s Why
- ID Cartoon Caption Contest (125)
- ID Cartoon Caption Contest #2 Winner — and a New Contest for the Holidays (92)
- Dear Nation — A Series of Apologies on COVID-19 (80)
- How to Induce Rage in a Doctor (77)
- IDSA’s COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Highlight Difficulty of “Don’t Just Do Something, Stand There” (74)
- Zinc for Patients with COVID-19?
- Observations from ID and Beyond: #IDTwitter — Still a Wonderful and Entertaining Place to Learn
- Improved Approach to Coronavirus Vaccines Works in Animals
- High CMV Viremia and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with AIDS
- Repurposing Alisporivir, an Anti–Hepatitis C Drug, to Treat Artemisinin-Resistant Malaria
- 3tc Abacavir AIDS antibiotics antiretroviral therapy ART atazanavir baseball CDC C diff COVID-19 CROI darunavir dolutegravir elvitegravir etravirine FDA HCV hepatitis C HIV HIV cure HIV testing ID fellowship ID Learning Unit Infectious Diseases influenza Link-o-Rama lyme disease MRSA PEP Policy PrEP prevention primary care raltegravir Really Rapid Review resistance Retrovirus Conference rilpivirine sofosbuvir TDF/FTC tenofovir Thanksgiving vaccines zoster