December 30th, 2021

Omicron and Reduced Severity of COVID-19 — Some Good News We Desperately Need

We’ve been burned so many times making predictions about COVID-19 that I should post this conspicuously by my computer:

The famous pundit meant, of course, that “you don’t know anything” — we know his true intentions since he also said “Nobody goes there anymore. It’s too crowded.”

The “know nothing” quotation is a reminder that COVID-19 is a new disease. While we do in fact know more than nothing, we still have so much to learn. This applies to pretty much the whole COVID-19 universe, including its origins, virology, immunology, epidemiology, prevention, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, and complications. Constantly learning, constantly updating assumptions, guidelines, and messages.

With that humble start, I’m about to write a sentence that fills me both with excitement and, I confess, some trepidation.

It looks like Omicron causes less severe disease than prior variants.

Why trepidation? Well obviously I don’t want to jinx it, we’re still in the midst of a very major surge.

As anyone with a pulse knows, a lot of people have been diagnosed with COVID-19 in the past few weeks, more than we’ve seen at any point in the pandemic.

In fact, our world right now is a mess. (I’ve gone back and emphasized this sentence with bolding and italics, as some readers have told me they missed my acknowledging this stark truth.) Some have a mild or asymptomatic case, but some are miserably ill, recuperating at home. A smaller number are hospitalized with severe COVID-19, especially the unvaccinated or those with impaired immune systems. Some proportion of all these cases could end up with long COVID, a dreaded complication with still no clear treatment.

Plus, each new diagnosis — regardless of severity — enormously disrupts family, school, work, and social life. What I’m about to write does not in any way to diminish how awful the pandemic is right now for just about everyone.

But looking at the evidence and clinical experience on severity, I’m going to poke the beast and conclude that Omicron does appear milder.

First, the big picture — we have a record number of cases pretty much everywhere in North America and Europe.

However, despite this extraordinary spike in cases, deaths from COVID-19 are numerically lower than they have been at any point since way back in October 2020, more than a year ago. Record high case numbers and fewer deaths means that the global case fatality rate has dropped — it’s now below 1% for the very first time during the pandemic. 

It’s even more encouraging when you consider that we are undoubtedly undercounting cases, both because people with mild symptoms are less likely to be tested, and because positive home tests are rarely reported. That denominator keeps getting bigger.

What these remarkable data tell us is that Omicron’s mutations may fool our antibodies, but our protection is far from useless — infection with Omicron occurs, but our primed cellular immunity (from prior infection or vaccines or both) quickly kicks in and takes it out. Go T-cells!

Second, let’s look at Omicron — the virus itself — in the lab, and compare it with other variants in its ability to inflict damage on various cells. Soon after Omicron appeared, a lab in Hong Kong reported that it grew less well in lung tissue than other variants.

Just one lab? Interesting, but let’s see what others find … and now we have no fewer than four others all reporting similar data, a veritable world tour that started in Hong Kong, but now includes Liverpool, Belgium, Japan, and Cambridge:

Less virus activity in the lung could mean less lung damage, the primary organ targeted in severe — and fatal — COVID-19. Hope.

Third, let’s talk with the front-line clinicians — people like you and me. The doctors and nurses seeing cases in South Africa told us repeatedly in late November that this Omicron-related COVID-19 was different, that patients were less sick.

They generated data to confirm their impressions, yet somehow some northern hemisphere docs still didn’t buy it.

South Africa just had a devastating Delta surge, the thinking went, so there was natural immunity protecting them — the lower severity may not apply here. And remember, it’s summer down there. Plus, can the data be trusted if not collected here?

But now, our data and our anecdotal impressions match theirs — in plain speak, they were right. Anyone doing clinical care currently in the United States would agree that most cases we see right now are truly mild.

Not just mild in the over-inclusive category of “not requiring hospital care.” But mild like any generic endemic respiratory bug — remember those? Many of the clinical encounters with patients with COVID-19 occur over the telephone, and even their voice sounds different from prior variants — stronger, more confident they’ll recover, less afraid. That’s highly anecdotal, I know, but it’s just what I’m hearing.

So what does this giant Omicron surge, with a seemingly less-dangerous variant, mean for the future of COVID-19?

What does it mean for the “average” patient who gets it? How about for the immunocompromised, the elderly? For young children?

What does it mean for the logistics of patient care, work, schooling, getting together with friends and family, or just trying to live our lives in some tolerable way until the surge abates?

What should it mean from a policy or public health perspective?

What do these early data on cross-immunity with Delta mean? Sounds promising, but what does it mean for protection against future surges, or the inevitable next variant?

I could speculate, both on the optimistic and pessimistic side.

But I don’t know nothing.

Happy New Year, folks.

8 Responses to “Omicron and Reduced Severity of COVID-19 — Some Good News We Desperately Need”

  1. Abigail Zuger says:

    Sometimes I wonder if our path going forward wouldn’t be easier if we had none of the diagnostics we do have (ab, ag, pcr, culture etc etc…). Imagine if there were no case count at all. We’d operate only by clinical illness. And, in fact, perhaps we’d do just as well in the long run, if not better. A cold, after all, is a cold. Except when it isn’t.

    I’m not totally sure about this, but just throwing it out there.

    Happy New Year, Paul. To better times…
    az

  2. Gordon Huth, MD says:

    Is there data on the percentage of patients hospitalized since omicron have been fully-vaccinated and boosted? Is omicron really less virulent in the completely unvaccinated population, compared to Delta?

  3. Thomas J Rush says:

    My gut tells me the same thing. Omicron appears to be uncontainable. The unvaccinated, immune compromised and people with significant comorbidities need to hunker down. Problem is that obesity, the real epidemic in this country and a very important comorbidity, is rampant.

    • Richard says:

      Why does an unvaccinated healthy 25 year old need to hunker down? They have a statistically likelihood of zero of dying from omicron. I really don’t understand all of the ID’s community obsession with cases, and the complete disregard for natural immunity. Omicron is a godsend. Embrace it. Lots of people getting boosted and developing good, durable natural immunity from it, better than any vax or boost. Follow the damn science!

  4. Evan Torch, M.D. says:

    South African colleagues don’t have the mind-numbing task of fending off a ruling political party which is obsessed with marginalizing doctors and leaving directives to the Catastrophic Dysfunctional Corps who must not provide optimism, ‘lest they be bludgeoned by a media anxious to keep big govt. — not physicians who aren’t beaurocrats— in control!

    What in G—— name happebed to refereed journals, department chairpeople, chief researchers et. al.!?

  5. Enrique Monteoliva says:

    Omicron is the vaccine of poor people and poor countries, and the vaccine of people don’t want to be vaccinated.

  6. Thomas Ball says:

    As a primary care physician who already has Omicron case experience in the 100s, experiential observation is entirely in accord with your statements. Even in my Assisted Living Facility nobody got very sick. Not so sure about the unvaccinated, however. So, do we continue to push strict (but now largely unsuccessful by my rough observation) measures to interrupt transmission? Perhaps we have a milder variant for now, this may be good for protecting people against worse. Or perhaps, more transmission still means unacceptable numbers of very sick people and also more virus evolution with unknown consequences. I ask those who know epidemiology better than I, do we let ‘er rip or try to keep the breaks on despite the political atmosphere?

  7. Christopher Steevens says:

    Our hospital just set a record for the most positive COVID cases in house. While it is true that not all of these are COVID pneumonia with hypoxic respiratory failure, and some may be just incidental findings, I can’t help but think that the COVID infection is contributing in most cases, particularly in the volnerable elderly poulation where it becomes yet another source of delirium, falls, metabolic derangements, etc., that this population has a hard time compensating for. On top of that, we have record amount of staff out with COVID. I appreciate the optimism, though.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Note: This is a moderated forum. By clicking on the "Submit Comment" button below, you agree to abide by the NEJM Journal Watch Terms of Use.

Our physician bloggers cannot respond to requests for personal medical advice, and recommend patients discuss health issues with their individual physicians.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

HIV Information: Author Paul Sax, M.D.

Paul E. Sax, MD

Contributing Editor

NEJM Journal Watch
Infectious Diseases

Biography | Disclosures | Summaries

Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.