An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
October 29th, 2011
Will An Antiretroviral Patch Help Adherence? Doubtful …
This little nugget came up recently, found by our Journal Watch Executive Editor:
Preliminary research suggests that a patch could deliver an AIDS drug to patients … The researchers successfully used transdermal patches to administer 96 percent of an AIDS drug to simulated skin over a week. “Still, the important limitation of pills, regardless of how few there are or even how minimal the side effects, is adherence,” Johnston [the investigator] noted. Research has shown that many patients, if not most, don’t take their pills all the time.
Setting aside for a moment the fact that most patients actually do take their medications just fine, thank you — and that this particular transdermal HIV drug delivery system hasn’t even been tested on animals, let alone humans — I have always wondered about the assumption that novel drug delivery systems would improve adherence.
Seems to me that the major problem with non-adherent patients isn’t that they can’t take pills.
It’s that they won’t take them.
And I strongly suspect that most would make the same choice when it comes to putting on a patch every day (or even every week).
Categories: HIV, Patient Care, Research
Tags: antiretroviral therapy, drug delivery systems, HIV
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
2 Responses to “Will An Antiretroviral Patch Help Adherence? Doubtful …”

Paul E. Sax, MD
Contributing Editor
NEJM Journal Watch
Infectious Diseases
Biography | Disclosures | Summaries
Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.
Search this Blog
Follow HIV and ID Observations Posts via Email
Archives
-
-
From the Blog — Most Recent Articles
- When Required Learning Modules Surprise You (In a Good Way) September 10, 2025
- End-of-Summer Musings — Hepatitis B, Dalbavancin, Alpha-Gal, and More September 4, 2025
- Watching the Chaos at the CDC — with Sadness and Alarm August 29, 2025
- On the Internet, Nobody Read My First Blog August 22, 2025
- Anal Cancer Screening in HIV: When Guidelines Get Ahead of the Evidence August 16, 2025
NEJM Journal Watch — Recent Infectious Disease Articles
- Should Emergency Departments Offer Routine Vaccines to Adults?
- Should Immunosuppression Be Interrupted During an Infection?
- Is Endotracheal Aspirate Adequate for Diagnosis of Pneumocystis Pneumonia?
- For Early Syphilis, Are Three Doses of Benzathine Penicillin Better Than One?
- Observations from ID and Beyond: End-of-Summer Musings — Hepatitis B, Dalbavancin, Alpha-Gal, and More
-
Tag Cloud
- Abacavir AIDS antibiotics antiretroviral therapy ART atazanavir baseball Brush with Greatness CDC C diff COVID-19 CROI darunavir dolutegravir elvitegravir etravirine FDA HCV hepatitis C HIV HIV cure HIV testing ID fellowship ID Learning Unit Infectious Diseases influenza Link-o-Rama lyme disease medical education MRSA PEP PrEP prevention primary care raltegravir Really Rapid Review resistance Retrovirus Conference rilpivirine sofosbuvir TDF/FTC tenofovir Thanksgiving vaccines zoster
Perhaps most patients in that Baltimore, MD study take their medications just fine… what about those at high risk for nonadherence? Putting on a patch once a week (perhaps supervised during a home visit by a health worker) could be a real improvement over twice-daily pills for some PLH whom I have encountered in a developing country setting. It could certainly be easier for those with a variable sleep or work schedule. I think it would be a simpler option for me if I were on ART.
Hi Amy,
Agree it might be handy … for those who agree to do it!
I also think that Baltimore study is pretty representative of a very challenging group of patients — here’s my review of it:
http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/53/6/605.full
My rough estimate is that around 10-20% of HIV patients don’t take their meds, but they loom very large in our minds since we spend so much time agonizing over them!
Paul