An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
October 3rd, 2011
CASCADE: When to Start, (Yet) Another Take
As we await the enrollment, analysis, and results of the START study — which is randomizing patients with CD4>500 to start HIV therapy vs waiting until the CD4 falls to 350 — much of the research on “when to start” ART in patients with high CD4’s comes from observational studies. Several have already been published (NA-ACCORD, ART-CC, CAUSAL), but one limitation of each of them is that none could accurately assess duration of HIV infection.
Enter “CASCADE“, or “Concerted Action on SeroConversion to AIDS and Death in Europe”. CASCADE includes patients from Europe, Australia, and Canada only if they have a defined date of HIV acquisition, thereby limiting effects of lead-time bias. In order to get at the when-to-start question, the investigators constructed something called “nested subcohorts” between 1996 and 2009, comparing the outcomes of those who started ART vs. those who didn’t.
The results? Out of 9,455 patients, starting ART (vs deferring) was associated with a lower risk of developing AIDS or death for those with a CD4 cell count < 500 — but not for those who started between 500-799. An interesting aspect of this study is that they were able to calculate a “number needed to treat” (NNT) to prevent progression. Over 3 years of follow-up, 21 and 34 patients would need to start treatment to prevent one patient from progressing to AIDS or death in those with CD4s between 200-349 and 350-499 respectively.
Usual caveats of observational studies apply — most notably that no such study can control for all factors between those who started ART vs those who didn’t that would influence outcome — but the results are helpful nonetheless, as the benefits of therapy before the CD4 cell count falls to < 350 shown here have been consistently seen in multiple studies. Furthermore, the NNT data to prevent AIDS or death — 34 for CD4 between 350-499 — place the benefits of treating these patients as even greater than what we accomplish with statin therapy for hypercholesterolemia to prevent MIs, which is estimated as 40-70.
Bottom line: Treating patients with CD4 350-500 and no symptoms may not be as exciting giving ART to someone with advanced HIV disease, but it sure makes good clinical sense.
Comments are closed.
Paul E. Sax, MD
Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.
Follow HIV and ID Observations Posts via Email
- Endless Recertification in Medicine — Some Thoughts About the Tests We Take
- Long-Acting Cabotegravir-Rilpivirine for People Not Taking Oral Therapy — Time to Modify Treatment Guidelines?
- My Vote for the Weirdest Antibiotic on the Planet
- Learning the Names of HIV Drugs Is Horribly Difficult — Here’s Why
- Really Rapid Review — Brisbane IAS 2023
- ID Cartoon Caption Contest (125)
- ID Cartoon Caption Contest #2 Winner — and a New Contest for the Holidays (92)
- Dear Nation — A Series of Apologies on COVID-19 (80)
- How to Induce Rage in a Doctor (77)
- IDSA’s COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Highlight Difficulty of “Don’t Just Do Something, Stand There” (74)
- Missed Chances for Screening in Persons Newly Diagnosed with HIV: New York City, 2018–2022
- Arboviral Disease Surveillance in the U.S.
- Observations from ID and Beyond: Long-Acting Cabotegravir-Rilpivirine for People Not Taking Oral Therapy — Time to Change Treatment Guidelines?
- Risk for C. difficile Infection Varies Widely with Choice of Antibiotic
- Mpox in Persons with Previous Infection or Vaccination
- Abacavir AIDS antibiotics antiretroviral therapy ART atazanavir baseball Brush with Greatness CDC C diff COVID-19 CROI darunavir dolutegravir elvitegravir etravirine FDA HCV hepatitis C HIV HIV cure HIV testing ID fellowship ID Learning Unit Infectious Diseases influenza Link-o-Rama lyme disease MRSA PEP Policy PrEP prevention primary care raltegravir Really Rapid Review resistance Retrovirus Conference rilpivirine sofosbuvir TDF/FTC tenofovir Thanksgiving vaccines zoster