An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
May 31st, 2025
How ID Doctors Get Paid, Part 2: Infection Control and Other Invaluable (but Often Invisible) Work
Before getting to today’s main topic, allow me a brief protest — three recent vaccine-related actions that reek of profound (and misguided) vaccine distrust from HHS leadership.
They are:
- Cancellation of a grant to develop an H5N1 vaccine. Preparation for this looming pandemic threat is critical, and there’s arguably no better way than having a vaccine ready.
- Removal of pregnant women as eligible to get a COVID-19 vaccine. This, despite their inclusion in the recent FDA decision. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) immediately protested.
- Ending a program developing an HIV vaccine. Just because something has been scientifically difficult, or has primary benefits in other countries, doesn’t mean the research agenda should be abandoned.
So painful.
(Deep breath.)
Ok, on with the main topic of today’s post. In Part 1 of this series, I described how ID doctors earn their income through direct patient care — consults, outpatient visits, and (less commonly) procedures. But clinical care is not the only source of salary support for our specialty. In this installment, I turn to the ways ID specialists support hospitals and healthcare systems. This work is often essential for optimal patient care but is frequently undervalued.
4. Agreements to provide critical hospital patient-care–related services. The most common are payments from hospitals to ID doctors to manage infection control and antibiotic stewardship programs, as these are required services in every hospital. Less often, an ID doctor might provide clinical advice (as a consultant) to the microbiology laboratory. For some ID doctors, these activities comprise a significant portion of their salary.
Similar agreements can sometimes be negotiated for other patient-specific activities — for example, at our hospital, we have payments to support care of patients with HIV (salary support is distributed to doctors, nurses, social workers), people with cancer- or transplant-related infections, and patients on outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT).
(For years, we did OPAT with no funding. I strongly advise anyone doing this now for free to do what we ultimately did — state you’ll stop providing this critical service unless it can be appropriately supported financially. Then set a date, and let the orthopedic surgeons, cardiologists, or whoever wants to discharge a patient on OPAT know they’ll be managing it themselves. If you’d like to read more about the hot potato of OPAT, I’ve got you covered.)
We used to have a contract to provide ID care and support for an affiliated community-based group practice, one owned by an HMO (remember those?). Two of us staffed a nearby clinic once a week, and just as importantly — since we weren’t on site full-time — we were funded to provide medical back up their outstanding nurses, who focused on ID/HIV care and fielded questions from our patients. I really enjoyed that work, especially the long-term patient relationships and collaboration with such a skilled nursing team. But when the HMO ended its affiliation with our hospital, the contract vanished too. Poof, decades of relationships, gone. Sometimes, the business side of medicine hurts.
5. Telehealth. Given the shortage of ID doctors, especially in rural areas, some hospital systems employ ID doctors to provide ID consultations remotely to affiliated hospitals, rehabilitation centers, and skilled nursing facilities. The consultations can take the form of telehealth consults directly with patients (with on-site providers giving more of the medical history), or clinician-to-clinician advice, with the caveat that the latter has little in the way of reliable billing options. (As I’ve noted a billion times. But who’s counting.)
Among academic medical centers, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) was a leader in this telehealth activity — even before the pandemic — and two of our ID fellow graduates partially support their salary through this work. Notably, UPMC had a strong incentive to develop telehealth since their network extended far beyond the city of Pittsburgh. For both patient convenience and cost, it made more sense to pay ID doctors for telehealth than to put the patient in an ambulance and bring them to the main campus for care.
Outside of academic medicine, private companies offer telehealth services throughout the country and some provide ID-specific care — one notably started by an ID specialist, Dr. Javeed Siddiqui.
6. Travel clinics. Since insurance does not cover many travel-related vaccines, some ID doctors own or work in travel clinics that are cash-first businesses, catering exclusively to a self-paying (and usually well-to-do) clientele. To quote Dr. Ron Nahass, who is not part of one of these clinics, and how they fit in our healthcare system: “It is a consumer product, not a medical service.” An amazing but true fact — many of these clinics won’t do an evaluation of someone returning from travel with an illness, but refer them to ID clinicians like us!
Importantly, this revenue model does not apply to all travel clinics. Many ID doctors who specialize in travel medicine work in nonprofit settings and provide excellent and comprehensive pre- and post-travel services — including evaluations of travel-related infections. Unfortunately, in certain academic medical centers, it can be a struggle to make them work financially for a variety of arcane billing reasons. I’m aware that some have had to close based on losing money, despite the important and in-demand service they provide.
That wraps up Part 2 (after that painful vaccine news up top). As a consolation, here’s the promised dog video. Will Pepper get a call-up to the show this season?
In Part 3: infusion services, pharmacy programs, industry-sponsored trials, and other creative ways ID docs try to keep the lights on. Stay tuned.
Loved the video and this series. I would add ID medical education as another way that ID physicians who work at an academic medical center might support their salary (fellowship PD, APD, and core faculty; micro course director in the med school). Although not directly clinical care, these positions are a part of the roles that many ID “clinician educators” take on. And of course there are non-ID specific education roles (course directors, clerkship directors, etc) that many of us do. A nice reference on this topic here https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33846943/ and the focus of an upcoming talk I’m preparing for in August 😉
Agree 100%, Darcy, thanks for the comment. I thought about including it, but then left it off since it seemed limited to academic medical centers (and this post was already WAY too long), but you make a good point. Here’s what I wrote in the intro to Part 1.
-Paul
I am really disgusted by all the ID gripes about our low pay at the same time as our profession professes its commitment to health. Health care at all levels is simply too expensive. For all the “good” we do, it should not cost so much.
Most medical care costs far more than its value. We need health policy, not health care policy.
Practicing infectious disease as a specialty is a privilege. We provide a tremendous amount of service to our patients, collogues and medical systems through our efforts in diagnosing and managing complex medical issues as well as designing and executing infection prevention strategies and streamlining transitions of care. ID is an intellectually rewarding specialty and, in many circumstances, is one that affords a work-life balance that rivals other medical and surgical specialties. Despite all this, we are seeing an exodus of medical residents applying to ID.
Discussing financial compensation for the work one provides while outlining the personal joy one gets from practicing ID should not be mutually exclusive. From the financial perspective, medical education has become much more expensive today compared to the 1980s and 1990s. Residents often emerge from training with student debt ranging from $300,000-$500,000. They enter the workforce with this investment, having sacrificed formative years in their lives, with the hope that they can pursue a career that will support a modest life. This may include starting and supporting a family, buying a house or car, all while paying back their debt. It is only natural that they seek a specialty that offers a financial upside. We could espouse the notion that the privilege of practicing ID itself should be the focus of physicians as they choose a career. However, I find it difficult to envision myself as a newly minted resident, saddled with nearly half a million dollars in debt, attempting to purchase a new car, a new home, and support my family, all while grappling with the insinuation that my intentions were not pure enough to pursue a career in ID.
Within our medical specialty, we possess a unique adaptability that sets us apart from other disciplines. Our comprehensive skill set encompasses a range of financially recruitable skills that offer flexibility and stability. Furthermore, our value lies in solving intricate problems rather than relying solely on physical abilities. This allows us to enjoy a better work-life balance, with ample time and space to prioritize personal well-being.
I think of ID as the perfect blend of intellectual stimulation, work life balance, and financial prosperity. To secure our future as a specialty, we must effectively market ourselves as such. Our future is in enlisting the brightest and best individuals that medicine has to offer.
I think ID fulfils our calling in the practice of medicine.
We should however do not let the powers who control the purse string of reimbursement downplay our roles in management of complex medical condition and complex patient care.
We need to add another layer of hyper specialist care for complex patients medically and socially
and add another charge for complex patient care in the charges.
Therefor justifying our input in efforts of solving complex problems. Meeting complex social demands among the patient who have special needs and situations in our society .
We need to push for another level of charges that justify our cerebral and social responsibility in the practice of medicine.
Hello Dr. Sax,
Thank you for a beautiful piece, your insights are always refreshing.
I’ve been wondering lately how Infectious Diseases practices might fare using the Direct Specialty Care model. Have you come across any examples of this being applied in ID? I’m curious if there are any clinics out there already trying this approach.
Would love to hear your thoughts.
Warm regards,
Dr. Tina Agbaosi