An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
November 30th, 2009
WHO HIV Treatment Guidelines Updated
This just in:
WHO is now recommending that ART be initiated at a higher CD4 threshold of 350 cells/mm3 for all HIV-positive patients, including pregnant women, regardless of symptoms.
Which makes eminent sense, of course. Because if starting HIV therapy might prolong survival in developed countries, why shouldn’t it do the same in the developing world?
In fact, when you consider the higher incidence of TB and invasive bacterial infections in such settings, it could easily be argued — and has been argued — that starting early would net greater survival gains in resource-poor settings than it would here.
Plus, there’s the CIPRAHT001 Study, which proves it.
But there’s more — the new WHO guidelines also urge that countries “phase out” the use of stavudine in favor of less-toxic NRTIs, and that women continue breastfeeding so long as they are also on ART.
Good news all around.
Categories: Health Care, HIV, Patient Care, Policy
Tags: AIDS, antiretroviral therapy, antiretrovirals, ART, guidelines, HIV, hiv treatment, Infectious Diseases, WHO
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
2 Responses to “WHO HIV Treatment Guidelines Updated”
Paul E. Sax, MD
Contributing Editor
NEJM Journal Watch
Infectious Diseases
Biography | Disclosures | Summaries
Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.
Follow HIV and ID Observations Posts via Email
- Brave New Name — How PCP Became PJP and Why It Matters
- The Riveting Conclusion of How PCP Became PJP
- Musings About a Bruising and an ID Link-o-Rama
- Marking a Social Media Mass Migration — Until the Next One
- Why We Have Antibiotic Shortages and Price Hikes — And What One Very Enterprising Doctor Did in Response
- ID Cartoon Caption Contest (125)
- ID Cartoon Caption Contest #2 Winner — and a New Contest for the Holidays (92)
- Dear Nation — A Series of Apologies on COVID-19 (80)
- How to Induce Rage in a Doctor (77)
- IDSA’s COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Highlight Difficulty of “Don’t Just Do Something, Stand There” (74)
-
NEJM Journal Watch — Recent Infectious Disease Articles
- Sulopenem Etzadroxil plus Probenecid (Orlynvah) for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections
- Radiolabeled p-Aminobenzoic Acid as a Marker to Detect Bacterial Endocarditis
- Clostridioides difficile Vaccines: Promising Contenders
- Observations from ID and Beyond: Marking a Social Media Mass Migration — Until the Next One
- Incidence of Autoimmune Diseases Involving the Skin, After Acute COVID-19
-
Tag Cloud
- Abacavir AIDS antibiotics antiretroviral therapy ART atazanavir baseball Brush with Greatness CDC C diff COVID-19 CROI darunavir dolutegravir elvitegravir etravirine FDA HCV hepatitis C HIV HIV cure HIV testing ID fellowship ID Learning Unit Infectious Diseases influenza Link-o-Rama lyme disease MRSA PEP Policy PrEP prevention primary care raltegravir Really Rapid Review resistance Retrovirus Conference rilpivirine sofosbuvir TDF/FTC tenofovir Thanksgiving vaccines zoster
Should the guidelines have suggested initiation at < 500 as is expected in the next iteration of US centered guidelines? Although ARVs are limited in many parts of the world should an individual patient be witheld therapy when there is an accumulation of data suggesting 500 (or higher) may be the tipping point? A conundrum in areas where supplies of ARVs are limited perhaps.
CM,
I guess one way of looking at “start at CD4 350” is “start at CD4 > 350.” I realize it’s not exactly the same thing, but since you can’t predict when or if the CD4 will drop, as a pt approaches this threshold (i.e., between 350 and 500), it’s time to get ready to start.
As you know, DHHS guidelines just out as well.
Paul