February 27th, 2025

Tragic Childhood Death from Measles Reminds Us That Some Don’t Understand Either the Medical Significance or the Human Heart

My ID colleague Dr. Adam Ratner, Chief of Pediatric ID at NYU Medical Center, just published an insightful and remarkably timely book called Booster Shots:  The Urgent Lessons of Measles and the Uncertain Future of Children’s Health.

Chapter Six is entitled “Making Nothing Happen,” and it starts off with this especially profound paragraph:

Prevention can be a tough business. A pediatrician talks to a parent about choking hazards or sleep positions or bike helmets, but she never gets to know which specific children that advice has helped. You can’t see prevention unless you broaden your view, looking at populations over time. Getting rid of leaded gasoline decreases childhood lead poisoning; changing recommendations about infant sleep positions lowers the risk of sudden infant death syndrome. But you don’t get to know which kids benefited — who would have not worn that helmet and had the bike accident, tipped over that unsecured television stand, died of SIDS… Vaccines are one of our best tools for prevention. They are amazing inventions that prevent serious diseases so kids can get on with their lives. But you never really know exactly who they helped. Vaccines are masters in making nothing happen.

I emphasized the last sentence, because it is the opposite of this “nothing” that happened to that poor child in Texas — who by not receiving their recommended measles vaccine, missed the opportunity for “nothing” and now is tragically dead.

And some of the responses to this case, including from the very person charged with running our Department of Health and Human Services, reveal significant weaknesses in understanding both the medical significance of the case, and, just as damningly, the human heart — how we feel when reading about a childhood death. These comments clearly aim to downplay the importance of this outbreak in general, and the death of this child in particular, so I’ll follow them with corrections:

  • “It’s not unusual.”  In fact, the last measles death in the United States occurred in 2015, in an adult. So it’s the opposite of “not unusual.”
  • “Outbreaks happen all the time.” This is the largest outbreak in Texas in more than 30 years. Measles was eradicated in this country in 2000, with sporadic cases happening only from international exposures. The drop in measles vaccination rates in some regions since then has led to some large local outbreaks — including this one in New York City which motivated Adam to write his book.
  • “Those hospitalized are mainly there for quarantine.” Not according to the chief medical officer at the hospital, Dr. Laura Johnson, who said “We don’t hospitalize patients for quarantine purposes.”
  • “Everyone I know had measles growing up, including me, and we all turned out fine.” That’s because with nearly universal infection, the denominator was huge. But before the vaccine became available in 1963, 400 to 500 people died of measles each year, most of them children. There’s your numerator.
  • “It’s just one death out of 124 cases, while 1 in 36 kids has autism.” The measles vaccine does not cause autism. The original paper was based on fraudulent data, and later retracted; multiple other population-based studies have found no relationship.
  • “If everyone else gets the vaccine, why should I have to worry about it for my child?” This isn’t so much a lack of medical knowledge problem, but a selfishness problem. Take a look at yourself in the mirror.

Let me turn now to why pediatric deaths and illness weigh so heavily in the minds of all healthcare providers and public health officials. It’s a lesson I’ve learned first-hand by being married to a pediatrician, watching my wife consumed with worry when a single patient in her practice is seriously ill. It’s captured well in this quote from Dr. Burton Grebin:

The death of a child is the single most traumatic event in medicine. To lose a child is to lose a piece of yourself.

This is why medical students, interns, and residents have so much closer supervision in pediatric teaching hospitals than in general hospitals. Why surgeons have to train an extra-long time to become pediatric specialists. Why pediatric practices field calls 24/7 from worried parents (especially first-time parents) about every little thing. (But some aren’t so little.) And it’s why the loss of a child is considered one of the most traumatic experiences an adult can have.

This is not ageism; this is human nature — who we are. And if the raw emotions don’t resonate, here’s some simple math:  Let’s say this death in Texas was a 10-year-old child; the death robbed this person of approximately 70 years of life, of being part of and building a family, of contributing to our society. And it’s not just deaths that the measles vaccine prevents. A case of encephalitis with residual neurologic deficits could lead to decades of disability, with extraordinary individual and societal costs.

So let’s remember that lifesaving childhood vaccines are indeed “masters in making nothing happen.” In this case, nothing sure beats the alternative.

The views and opinions expressed in this blog do not represent those of NEJM Journal Watch, NEJM Group, or the Massachusetts Medical Society.

10 Responses to “Tragic Childhood Death from Measles Reminds Us That Some Don’t Understand Either the Medical Significance or the Human Heart”

  1. Alice Cole, CNM says:

    This not only break my heart for the family, it breaks my heart for the community, and it breaks my brain trying to comprehend the willful ignorance (which is now being institutionalized in the United States) that led to this unnecessary death.

  2. Gordon Huth,MD says:

    Another great posting, Dr. Sax. Thanks!

  3. David says:

    I think that if your words do not represent the views of NEJM Journal Watch, NEJM Group, or the Massachusetts Medical Society, then you should find a new home to express your wise and sensible opinions

    • Michael Frank, MD says:

      Really! I thought the lawyers usually worded this as “…do not necessarily represent…” Saying just “do not represent” sounds like they actually disagree with you–do they?!

  4. Jonathan says:

    Great, piece Paul – your tone here is far different from so many of your ‘fun’ reads and it’s different for a good reason. i’m sorry you had to write this but glad you did. hits the nail on the head.

  5. Bart says:

    “The views and opinions expressed in this blog do not represent those of NEJM Journal Watch, NEJM Group, or the Massachusetts Medical Society” but they should

  6. Ilyssa Golding MD MPH says:

    Hi Paul,

    Sorry if this is not the appropriate forum for this…but, I was wondering:

    Can you address whether those vaccinated between 1957 and 1968 should receive a booster of the MMR vaccine? My understanding was that two forms of the vaccine were used during this time period(killed and live-attenuated) and that those who received the former should receive a booster.

    I am sure most people in this age group don’t have their original vaccination record, and, if they do, it may not indicate which form of the vaccine they received.

    I was born in 1963. When I learned of this issue years ago, I had a measles antibody titer drawn prior to having kids, but I read recently that this doesn’t necessarily confirm immunity (not sure why…).

    Anyway-very unfortunately-a large group of people may need guidance on this given the way things are going. Maybe you could address this in your next column?

    Thank you. Grateful for your wisdom and expertise.

    • Jonathan Blum says:

      That is an excellent question. The live vaccine was more common during that period, but it is almost never possible to determine which vaccine someone received.

      The answer is a little complicated, because it depends on whether you have evidence of immunity, such as a positive serology, and whether you are a healthcare worker. But the rule of thumb here is generally to re-vaccinate. There is very little downside, no matter what RFK Jr says.

      For the details, I would strongly recommend reading the “ask the experts” section on MMR at immunize.org. This organization provides valuable recommendations that are consistent with CDC guidance, but are often easier to use. Almost every tricky immunization question I’ve ever been asked is answered there. See. https://www.immunize.org/ask-experts/topic/mmr/

  7. Nile Barnes, PharmD says:

    Well written. Cogent, honest, and caring, characteristics missing lately.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Note: This is a moderated forum. By clicking on the "Submit Comment" button below, you agree to abide by the NEJM Journal Watch Terms of Use.

Our physician bloggers cannot respond to requests for personal medical advice, and recommend patients discuss health issues with their individual physicians.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

HIV Information: Author Paul Sax, M.D.

Paul E. Sax, MD

Contributing Editor

NEJM Journal Watch
Infectious Diseases

Biography | Disclosures | Summaries

Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.