February 4th, 2015
Clinical Significance of Non-IRA Disease in STEMI Patients
Beat J. Meyer, M.D.
This post is adapted from Dr. Meyer’s NEJM Journal Watch summary of an article recently published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Recent findings from a very large dataset suggest that obstructive non–infarct-related artery (IRA) disease is common among patients with STEMI and associated with increased mortality. Whether non-IRA lesions should be treated directly during the index admission, by a staged procedure 4 to 6 weeks later, or with optimal medical therapy (as suggested by the COURAGE trial) is a controversy that this study does not resolve. Unfortunately, the setting in which this decision takes place does not lend itself well to shared decision making with the patient — and as long as the decision is based on the opinion of any particular doctor, variations in clinical practice are likely to persist. Moreover, unless better invasive and noninvasive markers are identified to allow more-reliable identification of individual CAD progression (i.e., plaque burden and individual vulnerability), most physicians will continue to rely on coronary angiography findings for their management decisions, despite modest clinical benefits and increased costs.
What strategy do you currently favor for managing obstructive non-IRA lesions? Are these new findings likely to change your approach?
NEJM Journal Watch — Recent Cardiology Articles- Sex-Based Disparity in CABG Outcomes: Are We Moving Toward Parity?
- Can Genetic and Social Risk Scores Improve Cardiac Risk Prediction?
- Extensive Ablation vs. Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
- Can a Novel Stent Design Improve Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?
- Are Angiographically-Derived Coronary Physiology Measurements Ready for Use in the Cath Lab?