May 20th, 2010
Endovascular Repair of AAA: DREAM and Reality
Larry Husten, PHD
Confirming the recent finding of the EVAR 1 trial, the DREAM Study Group reports the results of 351 patients who underwent open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The report appears in the New England Journal of Medicine along with the print publication of the EVAR 1 and 2 trials. The six-year survival rate was similar in both groups (69.9% for open repair versus 68.9% for endovascular repair). However, open repair proved more durable: 81.9% of open-repair patients were free of secondary interventions versus 70.4% of endovascular-repair patients (P=0.03).
In an accompanying editorial, K. Craig Kent notes that in the U.S. “more than 60% of infrarenal aneurysms are repaired by endovascular techniques.” He writes that “patients with a favorable life expectancy should consider open repair” and that “all patients should be informed of the advantages and disadvantages of endovascular repair.”