An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
April 24th, 2010
Choosing an Official State Microbe
Wisconsin has selected Lactococcus lactis as its official state microbe:
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows: SECTION 1. 1.10 (3) (t) of the statutes is created to read: 1.10 (3) (t) The bacterium Lactococcus lactis is the state microbe. SECTION 2. 1.10 (4) of the statutes is amended to read: 1.10 (4) The Wisconsin Blue Book shall include the information contained in this section concerning the state song, ballad, waltz, dance, beverage, tree, grain, flower, bird, fish, animal, domestic animal, wildlife animal, dog, insect, fossil, mineral, rock, soil, fruit, and tartan, and microbe.
As any self-respecting Packer fan could tell you, Lactococcus lactis is a critical part of making cheese, in particular the state’s famous cheddar.
And though the bill passed last week, I have three remaining very important questions:
- What were the other contenders? When I think Wisconsin and microbes (which I do several times a day), probably the first bug that occurs to me is Borrelia burgdorferi (Wisconsin is a notable non-New England/Mid-Atlantic epicenter for Lyme Disease), followed shortly thereafter by Diphyllobothrium latum (think various marinated and uncooked fish popular in northern European diets). Did these get any votes?
- What will Massachusetts choose? I could see Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae, though perhaps Maine has a stronger claim to this lobster-related bacterium than we do — we’d better have a back-up in place, such as Babesia microti or Cyclospora cayetanensis, though for the latter the reference might be a bit obscure.
- Will other states go for the obvious choices? Legionella pneumophila for Pennsylvania, Coccidioides immitis for Arizona, Vibrio vulnificus for Louisiana, etc. You get the idea.
Finally, note that Wisconsin has both a state mineral and a state rock. In these tough economic times, you would think one or the other would be sufficient.
2 Responses to “Choosing an Official State Microbe”
Paul E. Sax, MD
Contributing Editor
NEJM Journal Watch
Infectious Diseases
Biography | Disclosures | Summaries
Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.
NEJM Journal Watch — Recent Infectious Disease Articles- Quorum Sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa — An Overlooked Treatment Target?
- Benefits of Comprehensive Primary Care for Persons Living with HIV
- An Autoantibody Implicated in Adult-Onset Immunodeficiency
- Clinical Diagnosis of Varicella Is Inaccurate
- Monoclonal Antibody Receives Emergency Use Authorization for Preventing COVID-19 in High-Risk Patients
Hello,
I live in the heart of Texas and I’ve talked with food health inspector about restaraunts and how ideas over food handling varies among the many wonderful ethnic groups we have here. Based off what he told me I think any microbe that causes a case of Montezuma’s Revenge would be appropriate for Texas. My pick E. coli. Not unusual to have empty soap containers in restrooms.
Mainstreet, how about this choice for Texas?
STARI — http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/stari/
(For a clue, here’s the tick vector: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/stari/lone-star-tick-image.htm)
Paul