-

Posts Tagged ‘TDF/FTC’

New PrEP “Guidance” Released by CDC

Paul Sax • August 9th, 2012

Categories: HIV, Policy

(1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

The CDC issued its second “Interim Guidance” on the use of tenofovir/FTC as pre-exposure prophylaxis for prevention of HIV, this time for prevention of HIV in heterosexually active adults. The rationale? Since January 2011, data from studies of PrEP among heterosexual men and women have become available, and on July 16, 2012, the Food and [...]

Sizzling Summer Serratias

Paul Sax • July 16th, 2012

Categories: Health Care, Infectious Diseases, Misc

(3 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

Several ID/HIV items to contemplate as the heat really kicks in here in the torrid USA: TDF/FTC approved for pre-exposure prophylaxis. The challenging issues of defining the best candidates for this strategy — and finding the providers to prescribe it — still remain, but FDA approval should at least help justify insurance coverage if clinicians [...]

Advisory Meeting Today on Tenofovir/FTC for PrEP, and a Proposed “Niche” for its Use

Paul Sax • May 10th, 2012

Categories: Health Care, HIV, Infectious Diseases

(3 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

From Bloomberg News: Gilead Sciences Inc.’s pill Truvada was safe and effective when used to protect uninfected people from getting HIV, U.S. regulators said in a report indicating the main concerns are when and how it should be used … The FDA asked its advisers to suggest who should get Truvada; what testing would be [...]

Post-Exposure Prophylaxis, the World’s Most Outdated HIV Guidelines, and What To Do About Them

Paul Sax • March 1st, 2012

Categories: Antiretroviral Rounds, HIV, Infectious Diseases, Patient Care, Policy

(7 votes, average: 4.57 out of 5)

Every time I cover HIV prevention in a lecture, it’s always kind of embarrassing to cite the “official” post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) guidelines, which are here (non-occupational) and here (occupational). That’s right, they were last updated in 2005, the year of Hurricane Katrina. Yes — more than six years ago. The alternative choices seem particularly curious (read: [...]

“Novel” Approaches to Initial HIV Therapy: Part I

Paul Sax • September 3rd, 2011

Categories: HIV, Patient Care, Research

(1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

It’s been several years since the “preferred” or “recommended” initial regimens for HIV treatment have been consolidated into one of the following four: TDF/FTC + efavirenz TDF/FTC + atazanavir/r TDF/FTC + darunavir/r TDF/FTC + raltegravir Any room for improvement in this “TDF/FTC + key third drug” approach? With the recent approval of TDF/FTC/rilpivirine, certainly this [...]

More Favorable Results on PrEP, But …

Paul Sax • July 13th, 2011

Categories: Health Care, HIV, Research

(3 votes, average: 4.67 out of 5)

As part of the usual flurry of studies released just before major scientific meetings, results of two pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) trials in heterosexual men and women have just been made public: In the CDC TDF2 study, 1200 HIV-uninfected men and women in Botswana were randomized to take oral tenofovir/FTC or placebo daily. Tenofovir/FTC was found to reduce [...]

Like It or Not, PrEP Enters the Clinic

Paul Sax • March 1st, 2011

Categories: Antiretroviral Rounds, HIV, Patient Care, Policy

(3 votes, average: 4.67 out of 5)

Since the publication of iPrEx, the hypothetical decision about whether to prescribe pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has become a practical reality. As a result, we’ve posted a case on the Journal Watch/AIDS Clinical Care site, describing someone who requests intermittent pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV. It’s a high-risk, HIV-negative man who’s been treated several times with post-exposure prophylaxis. [...]

Wow, That Was Fast: PrEP Guidelines Appear

Paul Sax • January 28th, 2011

Categories: HIV, Patient Care, Policy

(1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

With the ink barely dry on iPrEx — still tricky to type — along come “interim” guidelines from the CDC on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Based on the results [iPrEx], CDC and other U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) agencies have begun to develop PHS guidelines on the use of PrEP for MSM at high risk for [...]