Specialties & Topics
- Arthritis/Rheumatic Disease
- Breast Cancer
- GERD/Peptic Ulcers
An ongoing dialogue on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases,
May 27th, 2010
HIV Treatment is Prevention!
The Lancet has just published a large prospective study demonstrating the protective effect of HIV treatment on the risk of viral transmission:
3381 couples were eligible for analysis … Only one of 103 genetically-linked HIV-1 transmissions was from an infected participant who had started ART, corresponding to transmission rates of 0·37 (95% CI 0·09—2·04) per 100 person-years in those who had initiated treatment and 2·24 (1·84—2·72) per 100 person-years in those who had not—a 92% reduction (adjusted incidence rate ratio 0·08, 95% CI 0·00—0·57, p=0·004).
A similar observation was made in an earlier study presented at CROI 2009, not yet published. Astoundingly, the rate of transmission in this Lancet paper could have been be zero if analyses were limited only to those with undetectable viral loads on treatment.
So here’s the bottom line: HIV treatment dramatically, hugely, ginormously reduces the risk of HIV transmission.
(My daughter several years ago predicted that ginormous would become a word. She was right.)
Yes, we can quibble with some of the details — the 2009 study did not include viral load measurements, this one in the Lancet was actually part of a study of HSV treatment hence the results are observational, protection from infection is not 100% — but is there any doubt that HIV treatment is currently our most effective way of preventing the spread of HIV?
Some will say that the definitive study on this issue is HPTN 052, which randomizes the HIV-infected member of a serodiscordant couple to go on treatment or to wait until the CD4 cell count drops below 250. The primary endpoint is the rate of infection among the seronegative partners.
But that study is likely to exclude those most likely to transmit HIV, since it’s limited to people with HIV who have no symptoms, a relatively high CD4 cell count, and hence on average a lower viral burden.
At this point, it seems a no-brainer to me. Treatment is prevention.
Paul E. Sax, MD
Learn more about HIV and ID Observations.
- Mystifying Abbreviations on Daily Medical Rounds (46)
- Should Doctors Still Be Allowed to Wear White Coats? You Decide (43)
- Are ID Doctors the Worst Dressed Specialists? (39)
- A Ridiculously Long Post: How EHRs Expose Unspoken Hierarchies Within Medicine — Or Maybe Are Just Bad (34)
- Which Infectious Diseases Do We Fear Too Much? Which Not Enough? (33)
- A Ridiculously Long Post: How EHRs Expose Unspoken Hierarchies Within Medicine — Or Maybe Are Just Bad
- Lots of College Graduations ID Link-O-Rama
- Zika, Baseball, and Waiting for a “New Normal”
- Why ID/HIV Specialists Rank Last in MD Salaries
- Drug Prior Authorizations Are a Very Blunt Tool for Cost Containment — And They’re Annoying
Subscribe to HIV and ID Observations via Email
- Oral Antibiotics for Infective Endocarditis?
- New Insights into the Effects of Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies Against HIV
- Absence of Transmitted Resistance to HIV Integrase Inhibitors in Swiss Cohort
- Passive Immunization Against Monkey HIV Produces Encouraging Results
- Addiction Therapy Initiated Rarely for Injecting Drug Users with Infectious Endocarditis
Physician's First WatchToday's breaking medical news
- Abacavir AIDS aids clinical care antibiotics antiretroviral therapy ART atazanavir baseball CDC C diff CROI cure darunavir dolutegravir efavirenz elvitegravir etravirine FDA HCV hepatitis C HIV HIV testing ID Learning Unit Infectious Diseases influenza lamivudine Link-o-Rama lyme disease Massachusetts MRSA Patient Care PEP Policy PrEP prevention primary care raltegravir Research resistance Retrovirus Conference rilpivirine sofosbuvir TDF/FTC tenofovir vaccination